Creating Geological Surfaces from Probed Depth Values:
Probed depths or borehole logs provide us with
information on the subsurface geological layers for the site. When importing
and using this data in Civil 3D there are a couple of issues that need to be
looked at.
Issue 1: The surfaces created from the
depth values in Civil 3D are of limited use. What we really need are the elevation
values at each of the probe locations. We
need to convert the depth values into elevations.
Issue 2: Due to differing surface data
resolutions (typically more points in the existing ground surface) the bottom
of peat surface may not appear to accurately represent the geological layer –
it may not ‘follow’ the lie of the land. See screen grab below. (You could in
some cases see your subsurface extend above the existing ground in section). We need to create a surface that uses the probed depths and
also ‘follows’ the existing ground in the areas in between where we do not have
any probes.
There is workaround that has previously been posted on
a number of blogs and forums that solves both of these issues. Here it is
described as applied to a windfarm project - with a little bit of explanation
of what is going on in the background from a Civil 3D point of view.
Solution:
- Create a TIN surface from your probed peat depths – call it Probed Peat Depth.
- Create a volume surface using the Existing Ground surface and the Probed Peat Depth surface – call it Peat Volume. The order in which you add the surfaces is important (base – Probed Peat Depths, Comparison – Existing Ground). You now have a volume surface that has depth values that are equal to the elevation for the bottom of peat.
- Create a new TIN surface and call it Surface from Peat Volume. Paste in the Peat Volume surface. Pasting a volume surface into a TIN surface creates a surface with elevations equal to the depth values of the volume surface– we now have a TIN surface representing the bottom of peat.
The surface created in step 3 uses the probed peat depth
values and follows the existing ground in between probes. Note – this is not a true representation
of the sub-surface geology but it is a good base to start with.
Or you could use the Autodesk Geotechnical Module available in the IDS suites
ReplyDeleteUnknown, thanks for your comment. I don't think the geotechnical module will solve the issue outlined above unless they have changed it in the latest release?
ReplyDeleteDonal, you are quite correct, it will not solve this problem, the geotechnical module just does a triangulation directly between the boreholes and does not take into account the surface topology.
ReplyDeleteThis is functionality we would like to include in a future version of the HoleBASE SI extension for AutoCAD Civil 3D, the big brother to the geotechnical module. In the new version due to be released in the next couple of months, we will allow users to create point groups and surfaces at either true elevation or by depth down hole from any data in HoleBASE SI. Although this is not a total solution it will help To a degree.
By the way, nice blog
No the Geotechnical module definitely does not do this at the time of writing
ReplyDelete